The Acting Teacher
I'm stealing this. I admit it. I read it, and think it's important. So, thanks to Robert Barton for providing the words. I suppose, Robert, if you ever come across my blog, then let me know, and I'll get a cheque off to you or something.
"An acting teacher creates an environment (physical and emotional), and provides exercises, to help you explore and discover your potential. The teacher rarely inflicts his will or forces change. he aims to make you self-sufficient, and, particularly in beginning acting classes, is usually more concernedwith your overall awareness and growth as a person than with technical precision.
An acting coach functions much like a coach in sports: working with you on specific problems, having your try a number of solutions, fine-tuning the same moment over and over, driving you a little further than you thought possible. You go into a coaching session with definite problems to be solved. If it's a good session, you leave with some solved, and more to work on because the coach stimulated you to move ahead in specific areas. A coach's attention is in many ways the most direct or personal, and the efforts the most precise.
A director is the most likely of the three to impose his will on yours. He is the most likely to tell you (at some point sooner or later in the rehearsal process) exactly what he wants and (very late in the process) to lock much of what you do. This is because he has an opening night and a huge group of other company members to think about. In a show, you are part of a much larger package, one which will ultimately be in some way marketed. The director is ultimately concerned, to a larger degree than the coach and to a much larger degree than the teacher, with a finished product. The teacher is the one most concerned with process."
That was long, I know. If you read it, great - thanks.
Anyway, I feel like it emphasizes something about my job that not a lot of other teachers might understand. (Phys. Ed teachers may be the exception here) There are three distinct parts to the job. I work as all three things in Robert Barton's quote - a teacher (my primary function), a coach (those beautiful moments where I get the privalege of assisting a student with something specific (thanks Celia, for allowing me the opportunity to help you with your material)), and of course, a director (the role which, for several months of the year, takes up most of my time and effort).
It's not such a stretch, if you've read carefully what is written above, to begin to understand the nature of the relationship that a Drama Educator (all three roles in one!) builds with his students.
Is it different than the relationship that other teachers devolop with their students? In a lot of ways, yes.
But once you understand it.... well, it's not such a bad thing at all.
"An acting teacher creates an environment (physical and emotional), and provides exercises, to help you explore and discover your potential. The teacher rarely inflicts his will or forces change. he aims to make you self-sufficient, and, particularly in beginning acting classes, is usually more concernedwith your overall awareness and growth as a person than with technical precision.
An acting coach functions much like a coach in sports: working with you on specific problems, having your try a number of solutions, fine-tuning the same moment over and over, driving you a little further than you thought possible. You go into a coaching session with definite problems to be solved. If it's a good session, you leave with some solved, and more to work on because the coach stimulated you to move ahead in specific areas. A coach's attention is in many ways the most direct or personal, and the efforts the most precise.
A director is the most likely of the three to impose his will on yours. He is the most likely to tell you (at some point sooner or later in the rehearsal process) exactly what he wants and (very late in the process) to lock much of what you do. This is because he has an opening night and a huge group of other company members to think about. In a show, you are part of a much larger package, one which will ultimately be in some way marketed. The director is ultimately concerned, to a larger degree than the coach and to a much larger degree than the teacher, with a finished product. The teacher is the one most concerned with process."
That was long, I know. If you read it, great - thanks.
Anyway, I feel like it emphasizes something about my job that not a lot of other teachers might understand. (Phys. Ed teachers may be the exception here) There are three distinct parts to the job. I work as all three things in Robert Barton's quote - a teacher (my primary function), a coach (those beautiful moments where I get the privalege of assisting a student with something specific (thanks Celia, for allowing me the opportunity to help you with your material)), and of course, a director (the role which, for several months of the year, takes up most of my time and effort).
It's not such a stretch, if you've read carefully what is written above, to begin to understand the nature of the relationship that a Drama Educator (all three roles in one!) builds with his students.
Is it different than the relationship that other teachers devolop with their students? In a lot of ways, yes.
But once you understand it.... well, it's not such a bad thing at all.
